text: The weaponization of commercial drones highlights the worry of Homeland Security officials for the potential dual-use for domestic terrorist purposes. If employed by a Ukrainian insurgency, expect the federal government to develop mitigation and countermeasures to any new tactics, techniques, and procedures employed. The technology for counter commercial drones (CUAS) is available and has been employed in U.S. bases in the middle east. CUAS tools range from using an overlay of radar, electro-optical, signal detection, jamming, and control takeover technologies. The domestic challenge is that most of these capabilities do not fit within the legal framework for domestic law enforcement to use. Detection tools are often accepted; however, jamming and hacking these devices have strict legal restrictions unless used by federal agencies within specific high security events, such as the Superbowl and political party national conventions. The current government response for commercial drone risks focuses on licensing, registration, and remote identification; however, drones’ threats are difficult to counter and attribute to the operator. A notable example of this was the unsuccessful attack on the electrical substation in Pennsylvania using a modified commercial drone. Stricter rules can be implemented if more threats against domestic targets using drones are increasing. – D.F.LOW INTENSITY CONFLICT INTSUMFar Left Activity Rollup & OutlookEASTFUTUREBronx, New YorkSize: TBDActivity: A teen was shot twice in the head by police after running a red light and is in critical condition. Protestors intend to rally in the Bronx to protest the police shooting.Location: E 165th St and Boston Rd Bronx NY 10456Time: 1300 EST; Tuesday, 08 MAR— END REPORT